Technical SEO | Rankings · Traffic · Revenue
As a technical SEO agency we deal with the problems quietly costing you all three. Pages Google never finds. Pages too slow to compete. Pages that should rank and do not. We find what is holding your site back, fix it ourselves, and confirm it worked.
Found › Indexed › Ranked › Traffic › RevenueMiss one stage and the ones after it never happen.
What we fix
Six things quietly hold most sites back, and they feed off each other. If Google cannot read a page properly, it will not index it. If your site is badly organised, Google wastes time crawling the wrong pages and misses the ones that matter. If a page loads slowly, the visitor leaves before it even appears. Left unfixed, this means pages that take too long to show up in Google or never show up at all, less traffic while competitors move ahead of you, a frustrating experience for the people who do arrive, and sales you never make because customers were looking but could not find you. We fix these six in the right order, so each fix sets up the next.
01
02
03
04
05
06
This does not replace good content, and we would never say it does. It is what lets your content count. If a page is blocked, pointed elsewhere, or only loads its text after extra steps most search tools skip, it can hold the best article in your market and still show up nowhere, so the money you spent writing it earns nothing back. Fix the technical side and the content you already have starts working, and the visitors it brings in start turning into customers.
Why we're different
Most technical SEO engagements end at a findings document. The document is usually accurate. It then enters a development backlog, gets sized against product priorities, and waits. Months later the crawl looks much the same and the audit is out of date, because the site moved and the report did not.
We work inside a business that has been building and maintaining production websites for over a decade, so the engineers who ship code every day are the ones correcting your render path, restructuring your internal links and deploying your schema. Nothing is lost in a handoff, because there is no handoff between finding the problem and fixing it.
We build for where search is heading, too. More of your customers now start with an AI assistant, and it can only recommend a site it can reach, read and trust. More on that below.
Same finding. Different ending.
Machine readability
More of your customers now start with an AI assistant instead of a list of blue links, and the answer they get is only as good as the pages the model could reach and understand. The same technical work that makes a page indexable is what lets an LLM access it, extract the facts on it cleanly, and cite you as the source. Get it right and you show up inside the answer. Get it wrong and a model that cannot read your page simply quotes a competitor whose page it could.
01
02
03
This is not a separate discipline sold as an add-on. It is the same crawl, render and index work, held to the tolerance the newer crawlers require. Being cited by an AI assistant is becoming its own channel of visibility, and it is won or lost on whether a model can reach your page, read it, and extract it cleanly. A page that is easy for a machine to parse is easy for all of them to parse, and easy for all of them to recommend.
How we work
Not a performance claim, just the software behind the audit, so you know what is checking your pages. Findings from any of these are cross-checked against your own Search Console data before they reach the fix list.
Our process
Five stages, run in that order. The order carries the work: prioritising before the crawl is complete produces a list of the problems that were easiest to find rather than the ones costing the most.
Every reachable URL, crawled rendered and raw, cross-referenced against Search Console coverage, CrUX field data and your server logs. Logs are the part most audits skip, and the only source that shows which pages Googlebot genuinely spends its requests on.
A crawler flags hundreds of items and most of them do not matter. Each finding is scored on the traffic it is blocking against the effort to resolve it, so the list opens with what changes the numbers and states plainly which items are safe to leave alone.
Fixes shipped into your codebase or CMS by engineers, through your review process and your branch conventions, with every change documented. Template-level problems are corrected at the template so they stay corrected as the site grows.
The site is recrawled, URL Inspection is run against affected templates, index coverage is rechecked, and vitals are watched on field data as the 28-day window turns over. A change that deployed cleanly but never reached the index is still an open item.
Technical SEO does not stay fixed. A release ships a noindex, a plugin rewrites a canonical, a new script pushes INP past its threshold. Scheduled crawls and alerts on indexation, status codes and vitals surface it in days rather than at the next quarterly review.
Want to see what a full crawl turns up on your site?
The audit and the prioritised fix list are yours to keep, whether you implement them with us, with your own team, or on your own schedule.
Track record
The team behind Wegile DGTL has worked together for over a decade, running the complete marketing engine at its parent company, a software development company, and delivering campaigns for its clients before that. The results below were earned by this team across those years, on accounts where the technical work and the content work were run together.
Home Services · California · Landscape & Christmas Lighting · Landscaping · Turf Installation · Irrigation · Outdoor Lighting
ROMI in 2 years
ROAS (ad spend only)
Lower cost per lead
Lower customer acquisition cost
Elevated Seasons came to us after a previous agency spent their budget and delivered almost nothing. Sound familiar? We rebuilt the brand, launched Google Search and Performance Max, and ran the SEO strategy that took their revenue from a near standstill to consistent growth, still climbing two years in.
"I have been working with them for 2 years now and I am extremely satisfied with our working relationship. Communication has been clear, they are responsive and they follow through on what they say and do. They have been a crucial part in the growth of our business and we plan to stay partnered with them for many years to come."★★★★★5.0 · Nathan Murrell, Elevated Seasons
Digital Products & eCommerce · Paid Social Launch
Books sold
Time to sell out the run
A digital recipe book with hundreds of high-protein recipes built for weight-loss and GLP-1 audiences. Our team ran the paid social strategy behind the launch, testing hooks and formats against a cold audience, selling 2,000 copies in under three months.
"I've been working with them for nearly 10 years, and they've been an incredible partner every step of the way. From developing my fitness app and nonprofit app, to helping maintain and grow my website, their team has consistently delivered with professionalism and precision. They're responsive, reliable, and deeply knowledgeable, always guiding projects with care and expertise. I trust them fully and plan to continue working with them for years to come."★★★★★ 5.0 · Chris Powell, Deliciously Fit
Technical SEO questions
The questions developers, in-house SEO teams and business owners ask before commissioning technical work, answered plainly and in full.
A full crawl of every reachable URL, then a review of what search engines can do with them. Crawl budget and robots.txt directives, indexation and canonical signals, how each page renders once JavaScript executes, Core Web Vitals on field data rather than lab scores alone, internal linking depth and orphan pages, sitemap accuracy, redirect chains, duplicate and parameter URLs, hreflang if you run multiple regions, HTTPS and security headers, and structured data validity.
Server log files are then read alongside all of it, because logs show which of those pages Googlebot is actually requesting. That is usually where the surprises are.
Content and links compete for position. Technical SEO decides whether a page is eligible to compete at all. A page that is blocked, canonicalised elsewhere, rendered client-side with no server-rendered fallback, or buried six clicks deep can carry excellent content and never rank for it.
Technical work does not replace content, it makes content countable. The two compound, which is the argument for fixing the technical layer first: everything you publish afterwards inherits the improvement.
Ranking for some terms usually means part of the site is crawled and indexed cleanly, not all of it. The common pattern is a strong homepage and a handful of pages carrying the entire site, while templated pages, product variants, paginated archives or a JavaScript-driven section sit partially indexed.
An audit shows the gap between pages that exist, pages that are indexed, and pages that earn impressions. That gap is normally where the available growth already is, without publishing anything new.
It depends on the fix and on how often Google recrawls your site. Indexation fixes, such as unblocking valid URLs or correcting a wrong canonical, can show up within days of a recrawl. Core Web Vitals move on field data, which uses a 28-day rolling window, so improvements surface gradually across roughly a month.
Architecture and internal linking changes compound over several months as authority redistributes. Each fix is recrawled and verified rather than left for a ranking report to imply it worked.
We implement them. Fixes go into your codebase or CMS by the same engineers who ship production code, then each one is QA checked and recrawled before it is marked done.
A findings document with no implementation path is the most common reason technical SEO stalls, because the work ends up queued behind product priorities in a development backlog and ages out before it ships.
Yes, and it is a common setup. In-house teams usually own content, keyword strategy and stakeholder relationships, and want engineering capacity for the technical layer rather than another strategy document.
We work to your ticketing process, document every change, and hand over the crawl configuration and monitoring so your team keeps the visibility after the engagement ends.
It does, and the requirements are stricter. Most AI crawlers do not execute JavaScript the way Googlebot's rendering service does, so content that appears only after hydration is often invisible to them. They also respect their own user agents in robots.txt, which means a site can be fully open to Google and quietly closed to GPTBot, ClaudeBot or PerplexityBot.
Clean server-rendered HTML, accurate structured data and a deliberate crawler access policy are what make a page usable as a citation rather than merely indexable.
One last thing
A full crawl of your site, the findings that matter ranked against the ones that do not, and an honest view of how much of your current traffic ceiling is technical. Implement it with us, hand it to your own developers, or keep it on file. The document is yours regardless.
Get your free technical audit →Full crawl · prioritised fix list · no obligation
Prefer email first? hello@wegiledgtl.com
